EDITED for Brevity and With Additional Details (11/16/16):
My 4' x 6' HO layout runs on DC power. It has a mainline outer oval (controlled through a dedicated DPDT, center-off toggle switch) and a double reverse loop (figure eight) inside that oval. The two loops cross dead center in the layout via a 19 degree cross track. The mainline tracks are joined to the two loops at four places (bottom left, bottom right, upper left & upper right) by four remote Atlas turnouts.
The double reverse loop operation is all set up, properly wired and has been running flawlessly via a dedicated DPDT, center-off toggle switch since Day #1. One loop is connected to the toggle with green 20 AWG wire, and the other with orange 20 AWG wire.
The only glitch - and it's a relatively minor one - is that the loco slows down a bit only along a one-track stretch of track in each loop just after passing over the cross track. If you look at the layout as you do a map, then the slowdown occurs just a tad "northwest" and "northeast" of the cross track; that is, in both loops. (Sorry, I have no way to provide a schematic or diagram that might aid in visualizing my layout.)
So, to increase the electrical conductivity and reliability in those two trouble spots, I'm considering adding two feeder wires (green and orange, respectively) to the proper section of each loop - and to whatever else they need to be connected at the other end.
I have already measured a noticeable decrease in electrical conductivity at the two affected areas with my multi-meter. But since the tracks are already soldered together, I'm reluctant to de-solder and re-solder them - if that might indeed be the source of the problem (I don't think so, because it was a clean soldering job in the first place as best I can tell and the tracks are fairly new.). Instead, I'm looking at adding those two feeder wires.
So, the bottom-line - and only - question is this:
Just where (to what) do I need to connect each end of the two feeder wires in order to increase electrically reliability within the two loops?
Thanks for your help!
My 4' x 6' HO layout runs on DC power. It has a mainline outer oval (controlled through a dedicated DPDT, center-off toggle switch) and a double reverse loop (figure eight) inside that oval. The two loops cross dead center in the layout via a 19 degree cross track. The mainline tracks are joined to the two loops at four places (bottom left, bottom right, upper left & upper right) by four remote Atlas turnouts.
The double reverse loop operation is all set up, properly wired and has been running flawlessly via a dedicated DPDT, center-off toggle switch since Day #1. One loop is connected to the toggle with green 20 AWG wire, and the other with orange 20 AWG wire.
The only glitch - and it's a relatively minor one - is that the loco slows down a bit only along a one-track stretch of track in each loop just after passing over the cross track. If you look at the layout as you do a map, then the slowdown occurs just a tad "northwest" and "northeast" of the cross track; that is, in both loops. (Sorry, I have no way to provide a schematic or diagram that might aid in visualizing my layout.)
So, to increase the electrical conductivity and reliability in those two trouble spots, I'm considering adding two feeder wires (green and orange, respectively) to the proper section of each loop - and to whatever else they need to be connected at the other end.
I have already measured a noticeable decrease in electrical conductivity at the two affected areas with my multi-meter. But since the tracks are already soldered together, I'm reluctant to de-solder and re-solder them - if that might indeed be the source of the problem (I don't think so, because it was a clean soldering job in the first place as best I can tell and the tracks are fairly new.). Instead, I'm looking at adding those two feeder wires.
So, the bottom-line - and only - question is this:
Just where (to what) do I need to connect each end of the two feeder wires in order to increase electrically reliability within the two loops?
Thanks for your help!
Comment