Railroad Line Forums - ME switch problems
Railroad Line Forums
Username:
Password:
Save Password


Register
Forgot Password?
  Home   Forums   Events Calendar   Sponsors   Support the RRLine   Guestbook   FAQ     Register
Active Topics | Active Polls | Resources | Members | Online Users | Live Chat | Avatar Legend | Search | Statistics
Photo Album | File Lister | File Library
[ Active Members: 2 | Anonymous Members: 0 | Guests: 56 ]  [ Total: 58 ]  [ Newest Member: 4given ]
 All Forums
 Model Railroad Forums
 The On30 Line
 ME switch problems
 New Topic |   New Poll New Poll |   Reply to Topic | 
Author Previous Topic: On30 track Topic Next Topic: On3o layout  

ChiloquinRuss
Crew Chief



Posted - 02/04/2019 :  5:16:39 PM  Show Profile  Visit ChiloquinRuss's Homepage  Reply with Quote
I have had it with ME switches. I have had to repair almost every switch on the layout. What are you all using for track systems? My five main yard entrance switches I hand laid just so I can get something reliable. Thanks in advance. Russ

Country: USA | Posts: 679

brucet
Engine Wiper

Posted - 02/04/2019 :  7:16:16 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Russ if you read my 'need some technical help' thread you will see that I'm having similar issues.

I want to blame someone. So here goes! I wanted to use Peco from the day dot. But a friend of mine talked me into using ME turnouts. They look the part and the internet 'told' me that 'real' On30 folk use them. Well everyone of mine have caused headaches. They are simply too fragile and subject to to many variables between various locos. The frogs seem to shallow.
I have persisted because, like you, I used them in my yards and their geometry allowed me to gain some space.
The newer part of my layout uses Peco. Not one issue with them. They aren't as fine looking but because they don't have issues I don't have to look at them.

If I recall Troels Kirk uses Peco on his Coast Railroad. If they are good enough for him then they are good enough for me.

I'm about to install CurrentKeepers in my locos. But the long term plan is to replace all my ME turnouts.

bruce



Country: Australia | Posts: 425 Go to Top of Page

ScottyB
New Hire

Posted - 02/04/2019 :  9:55:41 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
If I'm not mistaken Troels uses Peco code 100 OO (HO) track. And that's why I use it too. Electrofrogs with insulated joiners on the two frog points and Porters roll right through them with no wiring needed

Everyone keeps saying "Oh it's not right for On30" and not only am I sick of hearing it but I just don't care. :)

Scott



Country: USA | Posts: 19 Go to Top of Page

ChiloquinRuss
Crew Chief



Posted - 02/04/2019 :  11:52:36 PM  Show Profile  Visit ChiloquinRuss's Homepage  Reply with Quote
Thanks for the info. Seems Peco is what I should be using also. My main concern is we have three balloon reverses that get a lot of traffic, so they will be first. I'll order up a couple and see how they work. Thanks again. Russ


Country: USA | Posts: 679 Go to Top of Page

kewlbrew
Crew Chief



Posted - 02/05/2019 :  11:44:16 PM  Show Profile  Visit kewlbrew's Homepage  Reply with Quote
I've used Peco On30 on my modules and I'm using them for my garage setup given their reliability. Others in the module group did use ME when they became available. The are fragile in our group's experience. Peco's installed in 2006 are still functioning. ME's, released sometime after that, have largely died. In my view, if you want beauty, buy a pre-fab switch and spike it to ME style ties, or scratch-build your own. Even with a pre-fab, it needs to be built to O Narrow geometry rather than HO Standard geometry. HO's do work but Bachmann On30 have O Narrow wheelbases and dimensions. They like O Narrow better than HO standard. The module group has tried both. My 2 cents.

-John


-John

Country: USA | Posts: 543 Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic: On30 track Topic Next Topic: On3o layout  
 New Topic |   New Poll New Poll |   Reply to Topic | 
Jump To:
Railroad Line Forums © 2000-19 Railroad Line Co. Go To Top Of Page
Steam was generated in 0.3 seconds. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000